April 19: Concertos for Two, Three and Four Harpsichords (BWV 1060, 1061, 1062, 1064, 1065; Cologne Chamber Orchestra; Helmut Muller-Bruhl, conductor)
Lotsa notes.
There’s a scene in the movie, “Amadeus” where Emperor Joseph obliquely expresses his low opinion of Mozart’s new work. The Emperor tells his aghast court composer, “There are, in fact, only so many notes the ear can hear in the course of an evening.”
This post covers my first exposure to Bach’s Concertos for Two, Three and Four Harpsichords.
So many notes.
Just as he did in the Harpsichord Concertos which we listened to in January, Bach once again has adapted his epic Violin Concertos and Double Concerto, but this time for multiple harpsichords. (The four harpsichords piece is an adaptation of a work by Vivaldi. All of these 1998 performances by the Cologne Chamber Orchestra with Helmut Muller-Bruhl conducting can be found on this collection on Naxos. (Apple Music, Spotify.))
Was Bach thinking something like this?
Maybe it’s because I know these concertos for strings so well, and love them so much, that these adaptations for lots of fingers feel to me like Bach gilding his own lilies. (I know of at least one reader who is upset with me right now.)
I generally find that piano music for four hands and music for two pianos leaves me unsatisfied. It’s hard for even the greatest performers to stay out of each other’s way, and something about the percussive nature of the piano and twenty possible simultaneous notes always winds up with too much clash.
Of course, these pieces are not without their pleasures. Here are some highlights.
BWV 1062 is a remake of the Double Concerto. Here’s where the melody appears and develops in the opening of the original (Stern, Perlman and the New York Philharmonic):
And here’s the harpsichord version, still great, but I prefer the strings only version.
A great moment of contrast in the second movement where the strings get stretched and held against all the plinky harpsichord notes (0:07-0:20 in the clip):
The concluding moments of the allegro third movement are poppin’:
The second movement of BWV 1061 strips down to two harpsichords. Very pleasant stuff. Maybe it’s easier for me to absorb because it’s slower. Bach doesn’t give any mid-movement resolutions, so here’s a snippet:
The finale vivace of 1061 mostly features the two harpsichords, but the orchestra is brought in big and powerfully a few times. I love the five big bass notes on the downbeats starting at 0:15:
The slow middle movement of BWV1062 has three harpsichords coming in one by one, listen on headphones for the separation:
Four is just a lot of harpsichords. Here they are with the orchestra in the concluding moments from BWV 1065, Bach’s homage to Vivaldi.
May your weekend be filled with harpsichord, should that be to your liking!
I've always loved the double violin concerto - it is the score for Concerto Barocco, which was my favorite ballet to perform. I somehow hadn't heard the second movement reworked for harpsichord - loved that bit you sampled with the "plinky" harpsichord notes over the held strings. The sweet and retiring harpsichord continuo in the violin version of the 2nd was always so moving to me, underneath the intertwining violins -- here's a bit of what is (I think) an especially slow version, danced by Paris Opera Ballet -- the footwork is clean and you can see where the choreographer really played with the continuo rhythm.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSpb75mZHcA
Again, thank you for encouraging me to listen to these! I've known the oboe and violin version of 1060 for many years now; incredible piece. I think that version "works" much better, especially in the slow movement where the oboe lends 'cantabile' qualities. 1062, likewise, I've known for many years as 1043. As a matter of fact, I believe it was one of the first pieces (by Bach or anyone) I encountered when I first started listening to classical music about 10 years ago. It remains one of my favorites by him, especially the iconic Largo. 1063 was a hidden gem for me. I've never heard it and really enjoyed it. That 3rd movement intro reminds me a little of the gavotte from orchestral suite 4 (can't wait to read your write-up on those). And last but not least, the unbelievable 1065. Might I mention the piece "after" which this was written is my favorite Vivaldi piece? That initial theme is addictive and irresistible. I wonder if Bach thought: original concerto, 4 violins = transcription, 4 harpsichords? In any case, I really love both versions.