Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Owl Green's avatar

I've always loved the double violin concerto - it is the score for Concerto Barocco, which was my favorite ballet to perform. I somehow hadn't heard the second movement reworked for harpsichord - loved that bit you sampled with the "plinky" harpsichord notes over the held strings. The sweet and retiring harpsichord continuo in the violin version of the 2nd was always so moving to me, underneath the intertwining violins -- here's a bit of what is (I think) an especially slow version, danced by Paris Opera Ballet -- the footwork is clean and you can see where the choreographer really played with the continuo rhythm.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSpb75mZHcA

Expand full comment
T. B. Davidson's avatar

Again, thank you for encouraging me to listen to these! I've known the oboe and violin version of 1060 for many years now; incredible piece. I think that version "works" much better, especially in the slow movement where the oboe lends 'cantabile' qualities. 1062, likewise, I've known for many years as 1043. As a matter of fact, I believe it was one of the first pieces (by Bach or anyone) I encountered when I first started listening to classical music about 10 years ago. It remains one of my favorites by him, especially the iconic Largo. 1063 was a hidden gem for me. I've never heard it and really enjoyed it. That 3rd movement intro reminds me a little of the gavotte from orchestral suite 4 (can't wait to read your write-up on those). And last but not least, the unbelievable 1065. Might I mention the piece "after" which this was written is my favorite Vivaldi piece? That initial theme is addictive and irresistible. I wonder if Bach thought: original concerto, 4 violins = transcription, 4 harpsichords? In any case, I really love both versions.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts